Adhesives, Sealants & Industrial Bonding worked example
Bond Inspection Workload at 23% documentation and retest allowance: a worked example
What does the result look like when documentation and retest allowance reaches 23%? The full calculation is worked below with real intermediate numbers. a quality manager needs to plan inspection time for bonded or sealed assemblies
The inputs for this scenario
- Bond joints to inspect: 720 points (unchanged)
- Inspection rate per inspector: 6 points/min (unchanged)
- Documentation and retest allowance: 23 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 20)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Base inspection time = bond inspection points รท inspection throughput) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 148 hr for bond inspection workload, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 120 hr for base inspection time.
- At this operating point the engine returns 23 % for documentation/retest allowance.
- At this operating point the engine returns 6 points/min for inspection throughput.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where documentation and retest allowance sits at 20% and the headline result is 144 hr, this scenario comes in 2.5% above the baseline at 148 hr.
- A figure at this level is achievable when documentation and retest allowance is genuinely sustained, not just peaked for a shift. It assumes a single average throughput across all joints; mixed joint types (structural vs. cosmetic) or a learning curve on a new fixture will skew the estimate.
Results at a glance
- Bond inspection workload: 148 hr (headline result)
- Base inspection time: 120 hr
- Documentation/retest allowance: 23 %
- Inspection throughput: 6 points/min
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Bond Inspection Workload calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.