CNC Machining worked example
Cutting Time vs Non-Cutting Time at 75% target cutting-time share: a worked example
What does the result look like when target cutting-time share reaches 75%? The full calculation is worked below with real intermediate numbers. measuring the cutting-time share of a CNC program or production cycle
The inputs for this scenario
- Spindle cutting (chip-making) time: 6.8 min (unchanged)
- Total CNC cycle time: 11.5 min (unchanged)
- Target cutting-time share: 75 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 65)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Cutting-time share = cutting time ÷ total CNC cycle time × 100) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 59.13 % cutting for cutting-time share, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 15.87 points for gap to cutting-time target.
- At this operating point the engine returns 6.8 count for cutting time.
- At this operating point the engine returns 11.5 count for total cnc cycle time.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where target cutting-time share sits at 65% and the headline result is 59.13 % cutting, this scenario lands almost exactly on the baseline at 59.13 % cutting.
- A figure at this level is achievable when target cutting-time share is genuinely sustained, not just peaked for a shift. A high cutting-time share is not automatically good — conservative feeds can keep the spindle engaged longer while still leaving removal-rate gains on the table, so pair it with cycle time itself.
Results at a glance
- cutting-time share: 59.13 % cutting (headline result)
- gap to cutting-time target: 15.87 points
- cutting time: 6.8 count
- total CNC cycle time: 11.5 count
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Cutting Time vs Non-Cutting Time calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.