Conveyors worked example
Station Cycle Time at 9.2% cycle time allowance: a worked example
Push cycle time allowance up to 9.2% and the picture changes. This example computes every intermediate figure at that operating point. an industrial engineer needs to verify whether a workstation can meet takt before balancing the line
The inputs for this scenario
- Total station work content: 72 sec / unit (unchanged)
- Effective staffed resources: 2 operators (unchanged)
- Cycle time allowance: 9.2 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 8)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Base station cycle time = total work content รท effective staffed resources) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 39.31 sec / unit for effective station cycle time, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 36 sec / unit for base station cycle time.
- At this operating point the engine returns 9.2 % for allowance applied.
- At this operating point the engine returns 2 operators for effective staffed resources.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where cycle time allowance sits at 8% and the headline result is 38.88 sec / unit, this scenario comes in 1.11% above the baseline at 39.31 sec / unit.
- Computes effective station cycle time by dividing total station work content by the number of staffed operators and multiplying by one plus the cycle-time allowance. The value of this scenario is the size of the gap it exposes: that gap, priced out over a year, is the budget you can justify spending to close it.
Results at a glance
- Effective station cycle time: 39.31 sec / unit (headline result)
- Base station cycle time: 36 sec / unit
- Allowance applied: 9.2 %
- Effective staffed resources: 2 operators
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Station Cycle Time calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.