ERP & MRP Planning worked example

Backlog Burn Down at 17% recovery schedule allowance: a worked example

This scenario runs the backlog burn down calculation on the strong side: 17% recovery schedule allowance, with every other input held at its documented default. a production planner needs to estimate when open backlog can be cleared

The inputs for this scenario

  • Open backlog quantity: 2,500 units (unchanged)
  • Net good output rate: 420 units / day (unchanged)
  • Recovery schedule allowance: 17 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 15)

Working through the calculation

  • Applying the documented formula (Base backlog burn-down time = open backlog quantity รท net good output rate) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 6.96 days for estimated backlog burn-down time, the number this scenario is built around.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 5.95 days for base backlog days at net output.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 17 % for recovery schedule allowance.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 420 units / day for net good output rate.

How this compares with the baseline

  • Against the tool's baseline example, where recovery schedule allowance sits at 15% and the headline result is 6.85 days, this scenario comes in 1.74% above the baseline at 6.96 days.
  • Use it when a backlog opens up and you need a credible recovery date, or to test whether added capacity will clear it in time. Treat this as a target state: the delta against the baseline quantifies what the improvement is worth before you commit to chasing it.

Results at a glance

  • Estimated backlog burn-down time: 6.96 days (headline result)
  • Base backlog days at net output: 5.95 days
  • Recovery schedule allowance: 17 %
  • Net good output rate: 420 units / day

Run it with your numbers

  • Every input above is editable in the live Backlog Burn Down calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.

Last reviewed 2026-05-12.