Fastener Manufacturing & Thread Rolling worked example
Wire Coil Yield at 71% target wire coil yield: a worked example
This worked example runs the wire coil yield numbers for a tougher week than the baseline: 71% target wire coil yield instead of the typical 98%. Calculate wire coil yield from usable fastener blank weight or count versus total coil issued, with a target yield comparison.
The inputs for this scenario
- Usable wire converted to accepted output: 4,850 lb or pieces (held at the documented default)
- Total wire issued from coil: 5,000 lb or pieces (held at the documented default)
- Target wire coil yield: 71 % (the input this scenario stresses; the baseline uses 98)
Working through the calculation
- The calculation starts from the formula this tool documents: Wire coil yield = usable output from coil รท total wire issued.
- Wire coil yield works out to 97 % at these inputs, and this is the headline figure for the scenario.
- Gap to coil-yield target works out to -26 points at these inputs.
- Usable output works out to 4,850 lb or pieces at these inputs.
- Wire issued works out to 5,000 lb or pieces at these inputs.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where target wire coil yield sits at 98% and the headline result is 97 %, this scenario lands almost exactly on the baseline at 97 %.
- Use it per coil or per lot to monitor material utilization, validate cost-standard scrap allowances, and prioritize yield-loss investigations. A result at this level usually justifies acting on the stressed input before touching anything else, because every other figure in the table is downstream of it.
Results at a glance
- Wire coil yield: 97 % (headline result)
- Gap to coil-yield target: -26 points
- Usable output: 4,850 lb or pieces
- Wire issued: 5,000 lb or pieces
Run it with your numbers
- To rerun this with your own numbers, open the live Wire Coil Yield calculator, set target wire coil yield to your actual value, and adjust the remaining inputs to match your operation.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.