Mattress, Bedding & Foam Product Assembly worked example
Compression Pack Rate at 68% target compression pack rate: a worked example
This worked example runs the compression pack rate numbers for a tougher week than the baseline: 68% target compression pack rate instead of the typical 95%. Calculate the effective completion rate of your compression roll-pack line, comparing actual packed units against the shift schedule to track on-time performance.
The inputs for this scenario
- Mattresses compressed and roll-packed: 92 mattresses (held at the documented default)
- Mattresses scheduled for the run: 100 mattresses (held at the documented default)
- Target compression pack rate: 68 % (the input this scenario stresses; the baseline uses 95)
Working through the calculation
- The calculation starts from the formula this tool documents: Actual pack rate (%) = mattresses compressed ÷ total scheduled × 100.
- Rate works out to 92 % at these inputs, and this is the headline figure for the scenario.
- Gap to target works out to -24 points at these inputs.
- Affected count works out to 92 count at these inputs.
- Total count works out to 100 count at these inputs.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where target compression pack rate sits at 95% and the headline result is 92 %, this scenario lands almost exactly on the baseline at 92 %.
- Use it at shift end or run end to verify the compression cell kept up with the build plan and to flag short-falls before they hit shipping. A result at this level usually justifies acting on the stressed input before touching anything else, because every other figure in the table is downstream of it.
Results at a glance
- Rate: 92 % (headline result)
- Gap to target: -24 points
- Affected count: 92 count
- Total count: 100 count
Run it with your numbers
- To rerun this with your own numbers, open the live Compression Pack Rate calculator, set target compression pack rate to your actual value, and adjust the remaining inputs to match your operation.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.