Metals, Steel, Aluminum & Coil Processing worked example

Coil Yield at 99% target coil yield: a worked example in metals, steel, aluminum & coil processing

What does the result look like when target coil yield reaches 99%? The full calculation is worked below with real intermediate numbers. Use it when a slitting, cut-to-length, or blanking run needs a clean prime yield percentage and gap-to-target for the production board.

The inputs for this scenario

  • Prime output weight: 24,000 lb (unchanged)
  • Master coil weight processed: 25,000 lb (unchanged)
  • Target coil yield: 99 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 95)

Working through the calculation

  • Applying the documented formula (Coil yield = prime output weight ÷ master coil weight processed × 100) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 96 % for coil yield, the number this scenario is built around.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 3 points for yield gap to target.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 24,000 count for prime output weight.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 25,000 count for master coil weight processed.

How this compares with the baseline

  • Against the tool's baseline example, where target coil yield sits at 95% and the headline result is 96 %, this scenario lands almost exactly on the baseline at 96 %.
  • A figure at this level is achievable when target coil yield is genuinely sustained, not just peaked for a shift. Yield by weight does not tell you where loss occurred; a low number could be edge trim, crop ends, or in-process rejects, so pair it with a scrap breakdown to act on it.

Results at a glance

  • Coil yield: 96 % (headline result)
  • Yield gap to target: 3 points
  • Prime output weight: 24,000 count
  • Master coil weight processed: 25,000 count

Run it with your numbers

  • Every input above is editable in the live Coil Yield calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.

Last reviewed 2026-05-12.