Nonwoven Materials & Technical Textiles worked example
Rework Cost at 98% reworkable share: a worked example in nonwoven materials & technical textiles
This scenario runs the rework cost calculation on the strong side: 98% reworkable share, with every other input held at its documented default. A quality lead deciding between reworking and scrapping a batch of off-spec rolls uses it to compare the labor cost against the material saved.
The inputs for this scenario
- Rework labor hours: 16 hr (unchanged)
- Loaded labor rate: 38 $/hr (unchanged)
- Reworkable (salvageable) share: 98 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 85)
- Line re-setup / threading charge: 150 $ (unchanged)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Rework cost = rework hours x loaded rate x reworkable share% + re-setup charge) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 746 $ for total rework cost, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 46.62 $ / piece for rework cost per unit.
- At this operating point the engine returns 596 $ for variable rework cost.
- At this operating point the engine returns 150 $ for fixed rework cost adder.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where reworkable share sits at 85% and the headline result is 667 $, this scenario comes in 11.85% above the baseline at 746 $.
- Use it whenever a lot of nonwoven web is flagged off-spec and you must decide between reworking, downgrading, or scrapping it. Treat this as a target state: the delta against the baseline quantifies what the improvement is worth before you commit to chasing it.
Results at a glance
- Total rework cost: 746 $ (headline result)
- Rework cost per unit: 46.62 $ / piece
- Variable rework cost: 596 $
- Fixed rework cost adder: 150 $
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Rework Cost calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.