Textiles & Apparel Manufacturing worked example
Marker Efficiency at 98% target marker efficiency: a worked example
What does the result look like when target marker efficiency reaches 98%? The full calculation is worked below with real intermediate numbers. Use it to evaluate nesting and layout efficiency in Textiles & Apparel Manufacturing and the cost of material drop.
The inputs for this scenario
- Area of pattern pieces on the marker: 82 in² (unchanged)
- Total marker area (fabric width × marker length): 100 in² (unchanged)
- Target marker efficiency: 98 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 85)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Material yield = material in finished parts ÷ total material consumed) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 82 % for marker efficiency, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 16 points for gap to target.
- At this operating point the engine returns 82 value for material in parts.
- At this operating point the engine returns 100 value for total material consumed.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where target marker efficiency sits at 85% and the headline result is 82 %, this scenario lands almost exactly on the baseline at 82 %.
- A figure at this level is achievable when target marker efficiency is genuinely sustained, not just peaked for a shift. It measures planar area only. It ignores fabric shrinkage, directional/nap constraints, plaid matching, and ply-count effects on real spread yield, so bench efficiency can overstate what the cutting floor actually achieves.
Results at a glance
- Marker efficiency: 82 % (headline result)
- Gap to target: 16 points
- Material in parts: 82 value
- Total material consumed: 100 value
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Marker Efficiency calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.