Tube, Pipe & Profile Forming worked example

Labor Per Assembly at 92% direct labor capture factor: a worked example

Push direct labor capture factor up to 92% and the picture changes. This example computes every intermediate figure at that operating point. Use it when labor per assembly in tube, pipe and profile forming is being put through a tube, pipe and profile forming weighted-cost review.

The inputs for this scenario

  • Assemblies produced per run: 100 units (unchanged)
  • Labor cost per assembly: 45 $ / unit (unchanged)
  • Direct labor capture factor: 92 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 80)
  • Fixed setup and tooling cost: 250 $ (unchanged)

Working through the calculation

  • Applying the documented formula (Labor Per Assembly cost = quantity × rate × capture factor + fixed cost) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 4,390 $ for weighted cost, the number this scenario is built around.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 43.9 $ / piece for per piece value.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 4,140 $ for captured value.
  • At this operating point the engine returns 250 $ for fixed adjustment.

How this compares with the baseline

  • Against the tool's baseline example, where direct labor capture factor sits at 80% and the headline result is 3,850 $, this scenario comes in 14.03% above the baseline at 4,390 $.
  • It computes the total direct labor cost for a forming run and the labor dollars carried by each individual assembly. The value of this scenario is the size of the gap it exposes: that gap, priced out over a year, is the budget you can justify spending to close it.

Results at a glance

  • Weighted cost: 4,390 $ (headline result)
  • Per piece value: 43.9 $ / piece
  • Captured value: 4,140 $
  • Fixed adjustment: 250 $

Run it with your numbers

  • Every input above is editable in the live Labor Per Assembly calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.

Last reviewed 2026-05-12.