Wire Drawing & Rod Processing worked example
Pounds Per Coil at 99% line efficiency: a worked example
This scenario runs the pounds per coil calculation on the strong side: 99% line efficiency, with every other input held at its documented default. Use it when pounds per coil in wire drawing and rod processing is being committed and you need a throughput number you can defend.
The inputs for this scenario
- Finished wire produced per coil: 1,200 units (unchanged)
- Drawing block runtime for the coil: 8 hr (unchanged)
- Line efficiency (uptime after breaks and threading): 99 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 90)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Raw pounds per coil = completed output รท runtime) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 149 units for effective throughput, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 150 units for raw throughput.
- At this operating point the engine returns 99 % for efficiency.
- At this operating point the engine returns 8 hr for runtime.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where line efficiency sits at 90% and the headline result is 135 units, this scenario comes in 10% above the baseline at 149 units.
- Use it when sizing daily output for a drawing block, comparing two rod sizes on the same machine, or validating a supplier's throughput claim before you commit a schedule. Treat this as a target state: the delta against the baseline quantifies what the improvement is worth before you commit to chasing it.
Results at a glance
- Effective throughput: 149 units (headline result)
- Raw throughput: 150 units
- Efficiency: 99 %
- Runtime: 8 hr
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Pounds Per Coil calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.