Hospital Equipment & Clinical Furniture worked example

Compliance Documentation with severity if this documentation gap surfaces in audit or the field of 3.5 score (1-10): a worked example in hospital equipment & clinical furniture

Here is what the math looks like when conditions slip. We hold every other input steady and drop severity if this documentation gap surfaces in audit or the field to 3.5 score (1-10), then walk the calculation through step by step. Score the risk of a compliance documentation gap for hospital equipment by rating severity, occurrence, and detection to produce a risk priority number for quality and regulatory reviews.

The inputs for this scenario

  • Severity if this documentation gap surfaces in audit or the field: 3.5 score (1-10) (the input this scenario stresses; the baseline uses 7)
  • How often this documentation gap occurs: 3 score (1-10) (held at the documented default)
  • Ability to catch the gap before release: 5 score (1-10) (held at the documented default)

Working through the calculation

  • The calculation starts from the formula this tool documents: Compliance documentation risk priority number = severity × occurrence × detection.
  • Compliance documentation risk priority number works out to 3.7 score at these inputs, and this is the headline figure for the scenario.
  • Compliance gap severity score works out to 3.5 score at these inputs.
  • Documentation gap occurrence score works out to 3 score at these inputs.
  • Documentation gap detection score works out to 5 score at these inputs.

How this compares with the baseline

  • Against the tool's baseline example, where severity if this documentation gap surfaces in audit or the field sits at 7 score (1-10) and the headline result is 5.1 score, this scenario comes in 27.45% below the baseline at 3.7 score.
  • The practical read: the gap between this scenario and the baseline is entirely attributable to severity if this documentation gap surfaces in audit or the field, so recovering it is worth quantifying in dollars before considering equipment or staffing changes. Multiplicative RPNs treat different score combinations as equal: a 7x3x5 and a 5x3x7 both rank near the same total even though a high-severity gap usually deserves priority regardless of detection.

Results at a glance

  • Compliance documentation risk priority number: 3.7 score (headline result)
  • Compliance gap severity score: 3.5 score
  • Documentation gap occurrence score: 3 score
  • Documentation gap detection score: 5 score

Run it with your numbers

  • To rerun this with your own numbers, open the live Compliance Documentation calculator, set severity if this documentation gap surfaces in audit or the field to your actual value, and adjust the remaining inputs to match your operation.

Last reviewed 2026-05-12.