Mixing, Blending & Industrial Batch Processing worked example
Scale-Up Ratio with pilot batch size of 50 L: a worked example
This scenario runs the scale-up ratio calculation on the strong side: pilot batch size of 50 L, with every other input held at its documented default. Use it when a formulation team is moving a recipe from pilot to plant and needs a production batch size that respects mixer geometry and process losses.
The inputs for this scenario
- Pilot batch size: 50 L (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 20)
- Scale-up factor: 100 x (unchanged)
- Geometric correction: 0.95 x (unchanged)
- Process efficiency multiplier: 0.97 x (unchanged)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Production batch size = pilot batch size × scale-up factor × geometric correction × process efficiency multiplier) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 4,608 L / batch for result, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 4,750 value for base product.
- At this operating point the engine returns 0.97 x for multiplier.
- At this operating point the engine returns 5,000 value for factor a x b.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where pilot batch size sits at 20 L and the headline result is 1,843 L / batch, this scenario comes in 150% above the baseline at 4,608 L / batch.
- Use it during tech transfer or process development when projecting how much usable product a production batch will yield from a proven pilot. Treat this as a target state: the delta against the baseline quantifies what the improvement is worth before you commit to chasing it.
Results at a glance
- Result: 4,608 L / batch (headline result)
- Base product: 4,750 value
- Multiplier: 0.97 x
- Factor A x B: 5,000 value
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Scale-Up Ratio calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.