Printing, Labels & Industrial Converting worked example
Print Run Cost at 99% good-copy yield: a worked example
This scenario runs the print run cost calculation on the strong side: 99% good-copy yield, with every other input held at its documented default. A commercial printer uses this to price a run and see how makeready spreads across the impression count.
The inputs for this scenario
- Sheets or impressions: 25,000 impressions (unchanged)
- Paper and ink per impression: 0.05 $/impression (unchanged)
- Good-copy yield: 99 % (raised for this scenario; the documented default is 95)
- Makeready and plate charge: 650 $ (unchanged)
Working through the calculation
- Applying the documented formula (Total run cost = impressions x paper+ink/impression x good-copy yield% + makeready charge) to the inputs above produces each figure below.
- At this operating point the engine returns 1,764 $ for total print run cost, the number this scenario is built around.
- At this operating point the engine returns 0.07 $ / piece for print run cost per unit.
- At this operating point the engine returns 1,114 $ for variable print run cost.
- At this operating point the engine returns 650 $ for fixed print run cost adder.
How this compares with the baseline
- Against the tool's baseline example, where good-copy yield sits at 95% and the headline result is 1,719 $, this scenario comes in 2.62% above the baseline at 1,764 $.
- Use it when estimating an offset or sheet-fed job, evaluating run-length breakpoints, or checking how makeready loads onto a quote. Treat this as a target state: the delta against the baseline quantifies what the improvement is worth before you commit to chasing it.
Results at a glance
- Total print run cost: 1,764 $ (headline result)
- Print run cost per unit: 0.07 $ / piece
- Variable print run cost: 1,114 $
- Fixed print run cost adder: 650 $
Run it with your numbers
- Every input above is editable in the live Print Run Cost calculator, which recalculates instantly and can be shared with the inputs intact.
Last reviewed 2026-05-12.