Supply Chain & Procurement calculator
Supply Chain Risk Score Calculator
A supply chain risk score distills three FMEA-style dimensions, how badly a disruption would hurt, how likely it is, and how hard it is to see coming, into one weighted number that lets you rank suppliers, parts, or lanes on a common scale. Procurement risk managers, supply-chain planners, and continuity teams use it to decide where to build buffer stock, dual-source, or run a supplier audit, rather than spreading scarce mitigation budget evenly across everyone. Unlike a plain FMEA RPN that multiplies the three factors, this weighted model lets you emphasize severity over the others, which matches how most operations actually feel disruption. The result is a defensible, repeatable way to turn a gut sense of 'this supplier worries me' into a scored, sortable risk register.
What this calculator does
- Score supply chain disruption risk as a weighted FMEA-style index: 0.40 x severity + 0.35 x occurrence + 0.25 x detection difficulty, so a hazard that is severe, frequent, and hard to catch scores highest.
- Use it when supply chain risk in supply chain and procurement needs a defensible ranking against other supply chain and procurement risks for the next review.
- It combines severity, occurrence, and detection ratings into a single weighted risk score, emphasizing severity at 40%, occurrence at 35%, and detection at 25%.
Formula used
- Weighted score = severity × 0.40 + occurrence × 0.35 + detection × 0.25
Inputs explained
- Disruption severity rating:
- Disruption likelihood rating:
- Detectability rating:
How to use the result
- Use it to build or refresh a supplier risk register, prioritize continuity spending, or screen new sources during qualification.
- The score is only as good as the input ratings, a consistent 1-10 scoring guide across raters is essential, or the weighting just formalizes inconsistent guesses; it also does not model correlated risks where several suppliers share one upstream failure point.
Current U.S. benchmarks
- U.S. manufacturing runs at 76.0% of capacity (Federal Reserve, Jul 2026). New factory orders are up 7.4% year over year (Census).
- Importers paid an average effective tariff of 12.4% of customs value in 2025 across the 57 manufacturing import families MFG Calcs tracks (USITC DataWeb), up from 3.3% the year before. Statutory and effective rates by family, with top source countries, are at mfgcalcs.com/tariffs.
- Sourcing currencies as of 2026-08-21 (Federal Reserve H.10): 6.721 CNY and 16.8909 MXN per USD. Landed-cost comparisons move with these daily rates.
Common questions
- How do you calculate a supply chain risk score? Rate severity, occurrence, and detection each on a 1-10 scale, then apply the weights: severity times 0.40, occurrence times 0.35, and detection times 0.25, summed. Ratings of 8, 6, and 7 give a weighted score of 7.05.
- What is a good supply chain risk score? On a 1-10 scale, scores under 4 are generally low-priority, 4-7 warrant a mitigation plan, and above 7 demand active intervention, dual-sourcing, buffer stock, or a supplier audit. A 7.05 sits at the top of the 'plan now' band.
- How is this different from an FMEA RPN? A traditional FMEA multiplies severity, occurrence, and detection for a 1-1000 RPN. This model uses a weighted average on a 1-10 scale instead, which is easier to interpret and lets you deliberately weight severity heavier than the other two factors.
- Why is detection weighted the least? Detection matters, but a highly detectable risk still hurts if it is severe and likely, you just see it coming. Severity carries the heaviest weight at 40% because the consequence of the disruption drives how much mitigation it deserves.
- What does the detectability rating mean here? It rates how hard the disruption is to spot before it hits your line, a high score means poor visibility, like a sub-tier supplier failure you would learn about only when parts stop arriving. Better monitoring lowers this rating and pulls the overall score down.
Last reviewed 2026-08-12.