What is the reshoring readiness score for metal-forming machine tools?

45 of 100 as of the latest month, a building case. The score combines tariff pressure (45/100), import dependence (75/100), and sourcing concentration (10/100) under the published RRI v2.0.0 methodology.

Why does metal-forming machine tools score this way?

The observed effective calculated-duty rate is 12.38% in this family, U.S. exports cover about 25% of what it imports, and its retained-source Herfindahl index is 1000. Under this screening formula, a higher observed rate, deeper import dependence, and more concentrated sourcing raise the score; they do not establish plant-level profitability.

Does a high score mean reshoring is profitable?

No. The RRI is a screening indicator: it says the public trade data points that way, not that any specific plant pencils out. Validate with your own landed-cost, labor, and capacity numbers before deciding.

Reshoring Signal

Metal-forming machine tools: Reshoring Readiness

The Reshoring Readiness Index scores metal-forming machine tools at 45 of 100 (building case): a 12.38% observed effective calculated-duty rate, import dependence 75/100, sourcing concentration 10/100. Transparent methodology, monthly USITC data. Free.

The short answer

Metal-forming machine tools has an RRI of 45 of 100, a building case: the observed effective calculated-duty rate is 12.38% (tariff term 45/100), U.S. exports cover 25% of imports (dependence 75/100), and the named-source concentration floor is 1000 HHI (10/100). The score is down 4.4 points over the past year.

The three terms behind the score

Tariff pressure 45/100 (45% weight): a 12.38% observed effective calculated-duty rate, level 41/100 with a one-year trend of 52/100.
Import dependence 75/100 (30% weight): U.S. exports cover about 25% of imports.
Sourcing concentration 10/100 (25% weight): 1000 on the complete-board Herfindahl index.

Frequently asked questions

What is the reshoring readiness score for metal-forming machine tools? 45 of 100 as of the latest month, a building case. The score combines tariff pressure (45/100), import dependence (75/100), and sourcing concentration (10/100) under the published RRI v2.0.0 methodology.
Why does metal-forming machine tools score this way? The observed effective calculated-duty rate is 12.38% in this family, U.S. exports cover about 25% of what it imports, and its retained-source Herfindahl index is 1000. Under this screening formula, a higher observed rate, deeper import dependence, and more concentrated sourcing raise the score; they do not establish plant-level profitability.
Does a high score mean reshoring is profitable? No. The RRI is a screening indicator: it says the public trade data points that way, not that any specific plant pencils out. Validate with your own landed-cost, labor, and capacity numbers before deciding.

About this data

A transparent screening indicator built from public USITC trade data, not sourcing advice. The tariff term uses an observed effective calculated-duty rate, not an entry-specific legal rate or cash-paid amount. Concentration is matched to the month's calendar year (latest completed year for newer months); import dependence is currently a latest-year snapshot applied across the series and will deepen into a true history as export years accumulate. The named-top-sources HHI is a floor. Validate any decision with your own landed-cost and capacity numbers.

Last reviewed 2026-09-05.