What is the reshoring readiness score for measuring and inspection instruments?

32.3 of 100 as of the latest month, a weak case. The score combines tariff pressure (32/100), import dependence (53/100), and sourcing concentration (8/100) under the published RRI v2.0.0 methodology.

Why does measuring and inspection instruments score this way?

The observed effective calculated-duty rate is 8.6% in this family, U.S. exports cover about 47% of what it imports, and its retained-source Herfindahl index is 840. Under this screening formula, a higher observed rate, deeper import dependence, and more concentrated sourcing raise the score; they do not establish plant-level profitability.

Does a high score mean reshoring is profitable?

No. The RRI is a screening indicator: it says the public trade data points that way, not that any specific plant pencils out. Validate with your own landed-cost, labor, and capacity numbers before deciding.

Reshoring Signal

Measuring and inspection instruments: Reshoring Readiness

The Reshoring Readiness Index scores measuring and inspection instruments at 32.3 of 100 (weak case): a 8.6% observed effective calculated-duty rate, import dependence 53/100, sourcing concentration 8/100. Transparent methodology, monthly USITC data. Free.

The short answer

Measuring and inspection instruments has an RRI of 32.3 of 100, a weak case: the observed effective calculated-duty rate is 8.6% (tariff term 32/100), U.S. exports cover 47% of imports (dependence 53/100), and the named-source concentration floor is 840 HHI (8/100). The score is down 10.4 points over the past year.

The three terms behind the score

Tariff pressure 32/100 (45% weight): a 8.6% observed effective calculated-duty rate, level 29/100 with a one-year trend of 38/100.
Import dependence 53/100 (30% weight): U.S. exports cover about 47% of imports.
Sourcing concentration 8/100 (25% weight): 840 on the complete-board Herfindahl index.

Frequently asked questions

What is the reshoring readiness score for measuring and inspection instruments? 32.3 of 100 as of the latest month, a weak case. The score combines tariff pressure (32/100), import dependence (53/100), and sourcing concentration (8/100) under the published RRI v2.0.0 methodology.
Why does measuring and inspection instruments score this way? The observed effective calculated-duty rate is 8.6% in this family, U.S. exports cover about 47% of what it imports, and its retained-source Herfindahl index is 840. Under this screening formula, a higher observed rate, deeper import dependence, and more concentrated sourcing raise the score; they do not establish plant-level profitability.
Does a high score mean reshoring is profitable? No. The RRI is a screening indicator: it says the public trade data points that way, not that any specific plant pencils out. Validate with your own landed-cost, labor, and capacity numbers before deciding.

About this data

A transparent screening indicator built from public USITC trade data, not sourcing advice. The tariff term uses an observed effective calculated-duty rate, not an entry-specific legal rate or cash-paid amount. Concentration is matched to the month's calendar year (latest completed year for newer months); import dependence is currently a latest-year snapshot applied across the series and will deepen into a true history as export years accumulate. The named-top-sources HHI is a floor. Validate any decision with your own landed-cost and capacity numbers.

Last reviewed 2026-09-05.