What is the cheapest country to import filtering and separation equipment from?

Canada. Its effective duty of 1.16% and freight of 0.69% add 1.86% to the pre-tariff price, the lowest combined load of any named source.

Why is there no dollar landed cost for filtering and separation equipment?

This family's lines report mixed units of quantity, so DataWeb cannot publish one implied unit price for it. We rank lanes by the real duty-plus-freight uplift instead, which is the honest comparison until a per-family unit price lands.

How concentrated is sourcing of filtering and separation equipment?

Mexico is the largest source at 30% of named imports. By the Herfindahl index (1270), this family is diversified. A concentrated map means fewer places to move volume if one lane's duty jumps.

Sourcing Signal

Filtering and separation equipment: Landed Cost by Source Country

Which country is cheapest to import filtering and separation equipment from? Canada carries the lowest duty-plus-freight load (1.86% uplift), China the highest (53.95%). Every named source ranked, from USITC DataWeb. Free.

The short answer

The cheapest place to source filtering and separation equipment is Canada, where duty (1.16%) plus freight (0.69%) add 1.86% to the pre-tariff price. China is the most expensive named source at a 53.95% uplift, a 52.09-point spread across lanes.

How to read this

Each source country's rank comes from its own real effective duty and freight share (USITC DataWeb), combined as (1 + duty) x (1 + freight). Lower is a cheaper lane.
This family reports mixed units, so there is no single dollar unit price; lanes are ranked by the duty-plus-freight uplift only.
The FX tag is a short-window cost direction from the currency's recent drift, not a dollar recompute.

Every source country ranked, cheapest first

1. Canada: 1.86% loaded (duty 1.16%, freight 0.69%), CAD trending dearer
2. Mexico: 3.48% loaded (duty 2.74%, freight 0.72%), MXN trending cheaper
3. United Kingdom: 10.4% loaded (duty 7.32%, freight 2.87%)
4. Italy: 11.39% loaded (duty 7.8%, freight 3.33%), EUR trending flat
5. Germany: 11.91% loaded (duty 8.93%, freight 2.74%), EUR trending flat
6. South Korea: 12.82% loaded (duty 7.92%, freight 4.54%)
7. Japan: 12.92% loaded (duty 9.08%, freight 3.52%), JPY trending flat
8. Taiwan: 16.75% loaded (duty 11.12%, freight 5.07%)
9. Vietnam: 21.34% loaded (duty 13.6%, freight 6.81%)
10. China: 53.95% loaded (duty 42.84%, freight 7.78%), CNY trending flat

Sourcing concentration

Mexico is the largest source at 30% of named imports; by the Herfindahl index (1270) this family is diversified.

Frequently asked questions

What is the cheapest country to import filtering and separation equipment from? Canada. Its effective duty of 1.16% and freight of 0.69% add 1.86% to the pre-tariff price, the lowest combined load of any named source.
Why is there no dollar landed cost for filtering and separation equipment? This family's lines report mixed units of quantity, so DataWeb cannot publish one implied unit price for it. We rank lanes by the real duty-plus-freight uplift instead, which is the honest comparison until a per-family unit price lands.
How concentrated is sourcing of filtering and separation equipment? Mexico is the largest source at 30% of named imports. By the Herfindahl index (1270), this family is diversified. A concentrated map means fewer places to move volume if one lane's duty jumps.

About this data

A sourcing-comparison indicator, not a customs quote. Lane ranking uses each country's real effective duty and freight share from USITC DataWeb; a dollar landed cost, where shown, scales the family's average import unit price and does not price a specific shipment. FX is a short-window cost direction, not a currency recompute. Confirm classification and duty with a licensed broker before you buy.

Last reviewed 2026-05-12.